4 ms·
For futureproofing, we should extend the scale to cover hypercanes [1], which (according to Wikipedia): - require ocean temperatures of 120 °F (50 °C) - have
by jcalx 3y ago
For futureproofing, we should extend the scale to cover hypercanes [1], which (according to Wikipedia):
- require ocean temperatures of 120 °F (50 °C)
- have sustained winds of 500 mph (800 km/h)
- have barometric pressures in their centers sufficiently low enough to cause altitude sickness
- may persist for several weeks due to above low pressure
- may be as large as North America or as small as 15 mi (25 km) — Wikipedia has an unhelpful caption about the size of the "average hypercane" (!)
- extend into the upper stratosphere, unlike today's hurricanes (lower stratosphere)
- due to above height, may sufficiently degrade the ozone layer with water vapor to the point of causing (an additional) hazard to planetary life
As of today, both a hypercane and a regular, run-of-the-mill catastrophic hurricane would be rated a Category 5. But I suppose hurricane categorization and nomenclature would be the least of NOAA's problems in such an event.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercane https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercane
- Nevermark 3y ago> But I suppose hurricane categorization and nomenclature would be the least of NOAA's problems in such an event. This is implausible to me. Just to be safe, we should get the naming done up front.