5 ms·
It sounds like they were never given written confirmation for the bonuses. How likely are you to face penalties if you put a "time bomb" in a codebase like this
by charred_patina 3y ago
It sounds like they were never given written confirmation for the bonuses. How likely are you to face penalties if you put a "time bomb" in a codebase like this? Something with plausible deniability like let's say like an authentication script that you have to run every 30 days or the program stops working for "security reasons". Also you're the only one who knows where the script is and how to run it.
- HeyLaughingBoy 3y agoAre you serious? Answer your own question: if it were legal, then you certainly wouldn't need "plausible deniability."
- charred_patina 3y agoSorry, replace "is it legal?" with "how likely are you to get caught and face penalties?".
- metabagel 3y agoIt’s not worth the risk nor the guilt.
- ParetoOptimal 3y agoWhy do companies need plausible deniability to fire someone fulfilling their role? Its the same idea from the opposite direction.
- mrkstu 3y agoNo.
- JamesBarney 3y agoThis won't get you the bonus, it'll just get you possibly sued and/or prison time. I think a better fix is to just not give to a company what you would regret giving. Don't put in 80 hours a week for months unless you have good reason to think it's going to be worth it and do it with the full knowledge that you might be gambling on the company's generosity.
- charred_patina 3y agoI mean, you could come back as a contractor and have them pay your rate to show them how to get the authentication script authenticating again. Obviously this isn't ethical. > Don't put in 80 hours a week for months unless you have good reason to think it's going to be worth it and do it with the full knowledge that you might be gambling on the company's generosity. I agree. I'm also not 100% convinced the original story is even true.