3 ms·
There must be a strategical reason behind this, I can't believe they'd make such a huge mistake. One possibility is that they're trying to corner the native la
by josefonseca 14y ago
There must be a strategical reason behind this, I can't believe they'd make such a huge mistake.
One possibility is that they're trying to corner the native languages so developers start migrating more and more into managed runtimes. This gives Microsoft more power and control over what the programers are doing on their OS. Removing C++ would be too big a hit, so killing off C is the compromise they found.
The fact that they recommend GCC is intriguing though, I can't quite make sense of that.
- pjmlp 14y agoWhile I could agree with you, the fact is that all other compiler vendors, that are also os vendors, are able to support both languages. So why not Microsoft? Their only excuse is that Windows developers don't care about C99, according to their surveys. Yet, this is one of the most requested features in Microsoft Connect.