You may have misread my comment, I'm on safe languages team. I'm complaining about the people that start projects in unsafe languages in exchange of a thin per

You may have misread my comment, I'm on safe languages team. I'm complaining about the people that start projects in unsafe languages in exchange of a thin performance boost, and then blame the compiler/runtime maintainers for their own code being unsafe in exactly the ways the spec says it can be unsafe to give them such an extra boost. Personally, I think all remaining C and C++ projects should consider either rewriting in a safer language or adopting additional tools to prove (not just test) the lack of undefined behaviour. Trying to compromise is just giving us memory safety CVEs one after another.