I'd ultimately disagree with "there's nothing wrong" but I see their point. De jure, the relevant actual "rights" one has are to remain silent and to be represe

I'd ultimately disagree with "there's nothing wrong" but I see their point. De jure, the relevant actual "rights" one has are to remain silent and to be represented. It's department policy that allows for a suspect to request a supervisor. It speaks to a corrupt department when they don't discipline the guy for violating said policy but that's not unlawful, just shitty. (Like, why have the policy?)