I usually reject pull requests with no tests. For one, tests often do a better job describing what the pull request is for than the actual description. Also, it

I usually reject pull requests with no tests. For one, tests often do a better job describing what the pull request is for than the actual description. Also, it's easier if they think through all the corner cases. It's true, it makes a bigger barrier to entry. But on the other hand, it also gives more value to the contributions. But maybe I should rethink my stance...