4 ms·
What a silly idea. Universities are not just in charge with academic education but rather with the formation of a person’s character. To succeed with the latter
by zahma 3y ago
What a silly idea. Universities are not just in charge with academic education but rather with the formation of a person’s character. To succeed with the latter, academic capability must be held alongside the estimation of one’s character, for it is not only about one’s intellectual capacity but rather how one uses it.
- asdff 3y agoIf schools started estimating the merit of one's character they'd have to probably throw out half of their own faculty and cut off ties with many of their donors.
- LudwigNagasena 3y agoIf academic education is not their top priority, it would be beneficial to separate research facilities from universities and let universities be glorified fraternities. It's a waste to spend resources of top professors on "formation of a person's character" when they can help build the next generation of elite scientists and engineers.
- thfuran 3y agoShould scientists and engineers not have good character?
- LudwigNagasena 3y agoI don’t think it’s a job of academia to instil “good character” into students. It reminds of scientific textbooks in the USSR that had to mention Lenin in their preface and the mandatory subject that taught the history of the Communist Party. Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's.
- mcmoor 3y agoNo, it doesn't. We already have K-12 for that and rightfully so. Academia is supposed to be a place for complete adults to be able to optionally invest to specialize. At this rate we have to admit that 12 years of general education isn't enough to build characters so we have to make K-16, which is certainly an option with its own concerns.
- thfuran 3y agoAnyone who has met a group of college freshmen could probably tell you they aren't exactly complete adults.