3 ms·

Hi non American here, I have never and likely will never fly on an American airline, but I'd very much like to not die because some dickhead cut costs and anot

Hi non American here, I have never and likely will never fly on an American airline, but I'd very much like to not die because some dickhead cut costs and another dickhead drilled the wrong holes in a part. The implicit assumption that all readers are Americans is ridiculous enough, making it an explicit reason for fudging the numbers to make a tire fire of public safety seem like it's just a dumpster fire is absurd.

stouset 3y ago
You’ll be happy to learn that Boeing and Airbus have roughly equivalent safety records. If you wish to fly safely, fly in countries and on airlines that observe stricter requirements on pilot training, rest, and CRM, and which are rigorous about maintaining their planes.
- TylerE 3y ago
  Which can basically be translated as avoid (especially) Africa, South East Asia (that isn't Japan or South Korea), and most of South America. Eastern Europe is a dodgy but no on the same level.
  - zht 3y ago
    neither Japan nor South Korea are South East Asia
    - TylerE 3y ago
      What part of Asia are they then? They’re East and south of its center.
      - Lazonedo 3y ago
        The vocabulary that defines geographical terms was always politically loaded and never meant to be interpreted in a scientific, rational manner. South east asia doesn't literally mean "everything that is south and east in Asia". Just like how Europe isn't an actual continent but an arbitrary border that defines itself, in reality, by "the place where white people live in the West of the continent and who aren't Russians". Because the actual contiguous landmass, is, well, Eurasia, and Europe is an arbitrary human color that paints something that doesn't exist over the world. https://dppa.un.org/en/northeast-asia https://dppa.un.org/en/northeast-asia The United Nations define Northeast Asia as being: Japan, China, Mongolia, South and North Korea. From wikipedia : > The term Northeast Asia was popularized during the 1930s by American historian and political scientist Robert Kerner. Under Kerner's definition, "Northeast Asia" includes the Japanese Archipelago, the Korean Peninsula, the Mongolian Plateau, the Northeast China Plain, and the mountainous regions of the Russian Far East, stretching from the Lena River in the west to the Pacific Ocean in the east >The definition of Northeast Asia is not static but often changes according to the context in which it is discussed. If you think really hard about what those countries have in common, something that isn't related to a rational view of geography, it's that they're asians who don't look too brown. Yes, the origins of the definitions of SEA vs NEA are racially motivated and they're terms we're stuck with because most of the world knows what you mean when you talk about SEA vs NEA. https://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/acta/15/kotokin/kotokin.html https://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/acta/15/kotokin/ko... > "On the intimate frontiers between the Russian and the Chinese empires," Kerner wrote in the 1920s, "are face to face the world's largest, fastest-growing white population and the world's largest, ablest and perhaps fastest-growing yellow population." Much the same could be said seventy years later, even if we would disavow the racial categories that provided much of the attraction for Kerner Those definitions were written by people who didn't shy away from calling others "Yellow population". But they also became part of the language enough that even entities like the United Nations won't bother trying to change them.

stouset 3y ago

You’ll be happy to learn that Boeing and Airbus have roughly equivalent safety records. If you wish to fly safely, fly in countries and on airlines that observe stricter requirements on pilot training, rest, and CRM, and which are rigorous about maintaining their planes.

TylerE 3y ago
Which can basically be translated as avoid (especially) Africa, South East Asia (that isn't Japan or South Korea), and most of South America. Eastern Europe is a dodgy but no on the same level.
- zht 3y ago
  neither Japan nor South Korea are South East Asia
  - TylerE 3y ago
    What part of Asia are they then? They’re East and south of its center.
    - Lazonedo 3y ago
      The vocabulary that defines geographical terms was always politically loaded and never meant to be interpreted in a scientific, rational manner. South east asia doesn't literally mean "everything that is south and east in Asia". Just like how Europe isn't an actual continent but an arbitrary border that defines itself, in reality, by "the place where white people live in the West of the continent and who aren't Russians". Because the actual contiguous landmass, is, well, Eurasia, and Europe is an arbitrary human color that paints something that doesn't exist over the world. https://dppa.un.org/en/northeast-asia https://dppa.un.org/en/northeast-asia The United Nations define Northeast Asia as being: Japan, China, Mongolia, South and North Korea. From wikipedia : > The term Northeast Asia was popularized during the 1930s by American historian and political scientist Robert Kerner. Under Kerner's definition, "Northeast Asia" includes the Japanese Archipelago, the Korean Peninsula, the Mongolian Plateau, the Northeast China Plain, and the mountainous regions of the Russian Far East, stretching from the Lena River in the west to the Pacific Ocean in the east >The definition of Northeast Asia is not static but often changes according to the context in which it is discussed. If you think really hard about what those countries have in common, something that isn't related to a rational view of geography, it's that they're asians who don't look too brown. Yes, the origins of the definitions of SEA vs NEA are racially motivated and they're terms we're stuck with because most of the world knows what you mean when you talk about SEA vs NEA. https://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/acta/15/kotokin/kotokin.html https://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/publictn/acta/15/kotokin/ko... > "On the intimate frontiers between the Russian and the Chinese empires," Kerner wrote in the 1920s, "are face to face the world's largest, fastest-growing white population and the world's largest, ablest and perhaps fastest-growing yellow population." Much the same could be said seventy years later, even if we would disavow the racial categories that provided much of the attraction for Kerner Those definitions were written by people who didn't shy away from calling others "Yellow population". But they also became part of the language enough that even entities like the United Nations won't bother trying to change them.