4 ms·
I'd love to use Fresh but a framework for web development which calls itself v1.x and yet only supports Tailwind for styling purposes feels very immature. The
by agos 3y ago
I'd love to use Fresh but a framework for web development which calls itself v1.x and yet only supports Tailwind for styling purposes feels very immature.
The fact that for the next iteration they are prioritizing view transitions and not CSS bundling is baffling.
- mring33621 3y agoHopefully, in a few years, someone will release an open-source library for javascript-based web development.
- rglover 3y agohttps://github.com/cheatcode/joystick https://github.com/cheatcode/joystick
- skybrian 3y agoWhy does CSS bundling need to be integrated? Couldn't you generate a CSS file in whatever way you like?
- agos 3y agoif I want to use any modern styling solution (CSS modules, Vanilla Extract, Panda, any CSS-in-JS...) a bit of collaboration by the bundler is needed. I can generate CSS file(s) in any way I like but I would have zero integration with the templates
- simlevesque 3y agoPersonally I'm happy with modern CSS using variables and nesting natively. The bundling step isn't necessary for the vast majority of usecase IMO.
- agos 3y agoall CSS-in-JS or styling solutions that allow for component scoping require some kind of bundling or otherwise interaction for the bundler. It's true most people don't need it, but most people don't need 90% of what Fresh offers, surely?
- brlewis 3y agoDid you try cutting the tailwind stuff out of static/styles.css? Maybe it will already do what you want.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- agos 3y agounfortunately they explicitly say they have no CSS solution other than plain files or Tailwind