4 ms·
I actually found this worrying, since it means they are not committed to make NextJS work nicely, quite the opposite they now have incentive to not make it happ
by crubier 3y ago
I actually found this worrying, since it means they are not committed to make NextJS work nicely, quite the opposite they now have incentive to not make it happen
- bartlomieju 3y agoBartek from the Deno team here - we are actively working on improving experience running NextJS projects in Deno.
- ultrakorn9968 3y ago[dead]
- cryptonym 3y agoNextJS doesn't have an incentive to run on anything else than Vercel. I wouldn't blame this on Deno.
- no_wizard 3y agoI think you're pointing the wrong finger here. The NextJS team should be working on making NextJS run better with Deno, not the other way around. If the NextJS team doesn't want to do the heavy lifting with that support, thats on them. I think its perfectly reasonable that the Deno folks have an approximate alternative to NextJS. After all, NextJS won't use native Deno idioms for example, it'll always be tied to Vercels' proprietary cloud infrastructure.