> Honest question, why not? Value for money. Most households don't spend their lives watching 4-8h of content every day, I'd think. I'm likely to watch maximu

> Honest question, why not? Value for money. Most households don't spend their lives watching 4-8h of content every day, I'd think. I'm likely to watch maximum 12h a month. So 6$ an hour? No thanks. And I'm talking maximum. Most months I spend 6h watching in total. That brings it up to $12 / hour. Pay-what-you-watch sounds better to me and many others. Show me a gradually increasing bill in the top right corner of the UI and I'll manage. Or give me only one subscription -- much less than $70 though -- and then you distribute my money to the proper rights holders. I shouldn't care who owns what, nor should I be bothered switching services. It doesn't matter if I'm a billionaire as well. Again, value for money.