2 ms·
Some things they could compete on, just because I'm overthinking this: - price (do I have to pay or do you offer free with ads?) - content quality (do you hav
by histories 3y ago
Some things they could compete on, just because I'm overthinking this:
- price (do I have to pay or do you offer free with ads?)
- content quality (do you have 4k movies?)
- organization (can I filter by director? Do you have a collection of all the Oscar-nominated movies from this year?)
- advanced controls (can I make a playlist of tv episodes?
Maybe I want to watch a series in a different order than it was broadcasted)
- accessibility (do you have subtitles in this language?)
- extras (does this have a commentary? a trailer? the cut scenes?)
- more extras (can I pause and get the name of the actor that's on screen or the name of the song that's playing?)
- dns_snek 3y ago> content quality (do you have 4k movies?) No, that arguably makes it even worse. You're adding a whole new dimension to the problem of "where can I watch this". Remember, the UX you're competing against is: 1. Open Kodi, 2. Open a 3rd party add-on that shall not be named, 3. Pick any movie or show that exists, 4. Select any available quality, from 100 GB 4K HDR releases to 1 GB 480p transcodes, 5. Play, anywhere, on any device, at any time
- histories 3y agoI was drawing a comparison with Qobuz and the lossless tracks. So maybe everyone has 1080p movies, but that streaming service has 4K.