2 ms·
> you're depriving a rights holder of revenue that they would otherwise gained. There's never been a single proof of a loss of revenue during research. So no,
by realusername 3y ago
> you're depriving a rights holder of revenue that they would otherwise gained.
There's never been a single proof of a loss of revenue during research.
So no, while it's usually a talking point on the anti-piracy ads, it's an urban legend.
- worksonmine 3y agoIf I wasn't pirating I would most likely have at least one service. I'm stealing just as much as I would be stealing if I took code from a developer without paying what we agreed to. The entire stealing/not stealing discussion is just useless semantics.
- scaryclam 3y agoThe inverse has also been suggested over the years: people who pirated at some point are more likely to pay for content now, whether or not they continue to pirate content