> So why would you abuse your reader by making it a pain in the ass to figure out what you mean? A psychonaout or a shaman would argue some insights are only a

> So why would you abuse your reader by making it a pain in the ass to figure out what you mean? A psychonaout or a shaman would argue some insights are only available on a drug infused spiritual trip. Musicians talk of flow. That state of discombobulation you dislike is not to meant to furnish you with answers but rather with new dots to notice and connect on your own. Not everything is a mathematical proof. I think the real reason this sort of style isn't attractive is because many try to emulate it who lack the talent and then it truly is noise. It is a lot to ask from a reader and the value is rarely there that is well observed. But sometimes the payoff is worth it. GBE resonates with a lot of people.