3 ms·
25% of all streaming globally is consumed on a mobile device. During the day (commuting to work, during lunch breaks) that number is much higher. Children's pro
by freddie_mercury 3y ago
25% of all streaming globally is consumed on a mobile device. During the day (commuting to work, during lunch breaks) that number is much higher. Children's programming is also largely consumed on mobile devices (well, tablets).
On small devices like that 4K HDR+ video is kind of meaningless.
- josephg 3y agoIt’s also kind of meaningless at regular tv viewing distances. I have a 4k tv but from my couch there’s no way I can tell 4k apart from 1080. And honestly, 480 movies (dvd resolution) still look fine to me too. They have a certain aesthetic softness to them that I quite enjoy. 30 seconds into a 480 film I stop noticing the resolution at all.
- bayindirh 3y agoThat's probably because your TV is seamlessly upscaling every signal it can receive to 4K. Newer TVs are very good at that.
- josephg 3y agoThat’s sweet of you to say, but it’s because I’m pushing 40 and my eyesight isn’t what it once was.
- saiya-jin 3y agoThere are no 'regular viewing distances' anymore, any guidelines were long ago thrown out of window. Some want to have cinema at home, some want a tiny screen in kitchen or bedroom, some want (or can only afford) something in between. Just do what works for you. But with lets say 'cinema experience' distance:size ratio you definitely can see the difference. I could clearly see it on Netflix 4k on tiny 55" 4k screen from maybe 2-2.5m. But of course after 1-2 minutes it becomes meaningless difference and your brain blends it, what you should focus is not seeing big banding pixels due to low bad compression in very dynamic scenes.
- offices 3y agoSo for 75%, including Youtube, it is meaningful?