3 ms·
It would not be the first time. https://twitter.com/JohnKiriakou/status/1682043052142231552 https://twitter.com/JohnKiriakou/status/1682043052142231552 https:
by sarcasmatwork 3y ago
It would not be the first time.
https://twitter.com/JohnKiriakou/status/1682043052142231552 https://twitter.com/JohnKiriakou/status/1682043052142231552
https://www.techdirt.com/2017/01/06/fbi-dismisses-child-porn-prosecution-after-refusing-to-hand-over-details-hacking-tool/ https://www.techdirt.com/2017/01/06/fbi-dismisses-child-porn...
- jstarfish 3y agoThat first link is hearsay. That second link is not evidence that they planted it. It's evidence of them using illegal means to discover it. These are not the same thing. Faking probable cause to search your car is not evidence that they planted drugs. Same as being exonerated for a wrongful conviction. It doesn't mean you didn't actually commit the crime and should let a wrongfully-convicted pedophile manage your daycare center. You really need to dig deeper than the headline to know what was wrongful about the conviction-- the actual offender later being caught is not the same as a procedural error by the prosecutor. Given that possession isn't the only charge for Schulte, it wasn't planted. None of this was even necessary to make the case; they could easily have dropped these charges.