This is a really long article which aims to debunk a whole field, yet... It begins by looking at "thinking fast and slow", which is one if the most debunkable p

This is a really long article which aims to debunk a whole field, yet... It begins by looking at "thinking fast and slow", which is one if the most debunkable psychology books ever printed. I have met no one who believes it's more than a single paragraph idea stretched out needlessly to 600+ pages. I also think others more riguros have debunked it previously but don't have the links to back my claim. I also believe psychology has significant issues. I do wish to see good writeups and efforts to better explain its problems. Yet... If the article claims to debunk a whole field, but starts by trowing shots at one of its weakest links, then I'm sorry. You do not deserve my time and effort to read the whole thing.