3 ms·

This article cites a single article discussing self-reported results from an online survey, published in the Journal of Business Ethics. I am not ready to call

• JumpCrisscross 3y ago
  > self-reported results from an online survey Via a survey link “shared in one Croatian social media group that brings together individuals who share interests in watching movies and TV shows” [1]. Moreover, “the survey was active for one month” during which “voluntary participants…were randomly exposed to one of two scenarios” and then asked to answer questions about “their emotional appraisal and their future intentions to engage with illegal and legal streaming services.” It’s an interesting pilot study. But the conclusion is limited to Croatian film enthusiasts who volunteer to take an online survey. It does create the case for broader research with a random sample. [1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563222002023# https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756322...!
  • throwaway290 3y ago
    Yep. A film enthusiast would obviously not choose a streaming service. Quality sucks/can't be ensured even if you are on a good connection and most people aren't. (And if it's a gathering and everyone watches on their own device at the same time then in addition buffering is unacceptable.) They eliminated legal ways to watch a film without streaming (apart from new mainstream ones that nearby cinema will show) so that's what they get.