3 ms·
I know you're being silly, but you'd have to be pretty obsessive to have it cost more than streaming. Internet says Netflix movies are about 5 GB at 1080p and 1
by ndriscoll 3y ago
I know you're being silly, but you'd have to be pretty obsessive to have it cost more than streaming. Internet says Netflix movies are about 5 GB at 1080p and 15 GB at 4k. At $10/TB, that's $0.05 or $0.15 per movie for equal quality. At $15.50/month for 1080p Netflix, that's 310 movies/month, or 10/day, which no one person can watch. At $23/month for 4k Netflix, that's 153 movies/month, or 5/day, which you'd have to be unemployed and have no life to watch.
Even with Blu-ray rips of 30 GB and 70 GB respectively, you're looking at 52 and 33 movies per month, which is more than 1/day (assuming no rewatches), which is still an awful lot of movie watching.
You could add something like 1:5 parity without changing the story much. Or get a friend to buy the hardware for a system that you maintain, and use them as a backup instead of parity. Even at $8/month to be on someone else's account, that's still 53 4k Netflix quality movies/month, so still makes economic sense for them.
This is course all assumes you never delete something after you've watched it.
So you'd really have to just be downloading everything you can find without even wanting to watch it to have the cost work out higher.
- lukevp 3y agoI think your point is valid and it’s not way more expensive to host your own, but $10/tb all-in as hosted space is way low of an estimate. If you are getting a NAS that’s big enough to have 1:5 parity it’s gonna be a 6 or 8 bay so maybe $1k, and you’ve gotta amortize that across 10 years which is $8.3 a month. You’ve also gotta pay a lot more electricity to run the NAS. At 50w/hr it works out to 36kw/mo which is $7.2 at 20c/kwh which is a reasonable rate for electricity factoring in fees and such. Then you have to also use up part of your bandwidth and keep some machine running 24/7 to torrent or you have to pay for a seedbox, which is another $5/mo at least. You also might need networking hardware to hardwire this thing in, but let’s leave that off. We’re already at $20/mo of additional costs just for one NAS to keep it running, independent of drive costs. Granted if you go this route you can host media from multiple different streaming services if you so choose, which changes the calculus some.
- ndriscoll 3y agoYou don't need to spend $1k on a NAS. Go on eBay and buy an old motherboard with 6 SATA ports and an m.2 slot for the OS. I see one with a CPU for $88 incl. shipping right now. You might be able to do better. Throw it in any case. If you don't have one, buy any ATX tower on eBay for $30. You might even be able to combine the previous two steps. If you don't have enough bays, just leave the tower on its side with the disks floating somewhere. I did that for years when I was a teenager and it's fine. Then you just need a PSU and disks. Or if you're into nerd stuff like this you might have an old computer that you can reuse and you just need disks. You also don't need to leave it on 24/7. Around me the bottom tier download for Comcast is 75 Mb/s, which is 5-10x the bit rate of streaming, so after an initial period to get you started and build up a buffer, you should be able to build your collection faster than you can watch it on average while only keeping it on while you watch.
- RajT88 3y agoI got a 4 SATA bay chassis for 75 on Amazon. PSU was 50, board, CPU and RAM was 130. The drives were another 500... You can get project cost down by using refurb drives for OS/scratch. Or just picking drives more based on price per TB than a target storage amount
- wincy 3y agoI just used my old PC when I got a new one, use that as my NAS/torrent box with vpn, and kept buying HDDs for it. I'm up to 45TB but it never really "hurt", as I just buy a new drive when things feel tight. At this point I'm going to keep purchasing 18TB drives instead of smaller ones, it seems like the sweet spot of capacity to price right now.