4 ms·

ok, so whatever happens, happens. Let's imagine in 100 years, the country is 90% black. Who cares. It is whatever it turns out to be.

by mbfg 3y ago

worksonmine 3y ago
Correct, and probably how things end up based on birth rates alone. What is a problem however is the wording: > An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop, nonstop. > Folks [...] of European descent [...] will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America, absolute minority. [...] That's not a bad thing. That's a source of our strength It can be interpreted as the nonstop immigration is a tool with the goal of changing the demographics. Why? What's so important and why do they put a value on proportions of race? Just now in Texas you have federal and state employees fighting against each other, the former to let as many as possible in, the latter to prevent it. What is the goal here? My take on not just this example but the race discussions in general are to divide and keep us busy fighting over useless issues to distract us from the corruption. Same with the east vs west endless war, we need an external enemy to be outraged against so we can ignore the enemies within. Otherwise we might be able to put the differences aside and collaborate to achieve something useful as a planet, but how would that help the elite to keep living like gods?
- 303uru 3y ago
  You could start with arguing in good faith, because this: >you have federal and state employees fighting against each other, the former to let as many as possible in Is flat out false. There are laws in this country and we have a process for asylum seekers. Texas is choosing to not follow those laws AND it thinks it gets to override the Fed on issues of border control, the law is real clear on both.
  - worksonmine 3y ago
    Why does the border control want to cut the fences to begin with? What's wrong with the official paths for asylum seekers? The right to seek asylum doesn't have to mean the country has to help them cross by illegal means. I live in a country where we tried that, doesn't help anyone least of all the migrants forced to live in underground communities. Incentivising chaos only brings more chaos, which may even be the goal.

ok, so whatever happens, happens. Let's imagine in 100 years, the country is 90% black. Who cares. It is whatever it turns out to be.

by mbfg 3y ago

ok, so whatever happens, happens. Let's imagine in 100 years, the country is 90% black. Who cares. It is whatever it turns out to be.

worksonmine 3y ago

Correct, and probably how things end up based on birth rates alone. What is a problem however is the wording: > An unrelenting stream of immigration, nonstop, nonstop. > Folks [...] of European descent [...] will be in an absolute minority in the United States of America, absolute minority. [...] That's not a bad thing. That's a source of our strength It can be interpreted as the nonstop immigration is a tool with the goal of changing the demographics. Why? What's so important and why do they put a value on proportions of race? Just now in Texas you have federal and state employees fighting against each other, the former to let as many as possible in, the latter to prevent it. What is the goal here? My take on not just this example but the race discussions in general are to divide and keep us busy fighting over useless issues to distract us from the corruption. Same with the east vs west endless war, we need an external enemy to be outraged against so we can ignore the enemies within. Otherwise we might be able to put the differences aside and collaborate to achieve something useful as a planet, but how would that help the elite to keep living like gods?

303uru 3y ago
You could start with arguing in good faith, because this: >you have federal and state employees fighting against each other, the former to let as many as possible in Is flat out false. There are laws in this country and we have a process for asylum seekers. Texas is choosing to not follow those laws AND it thinks it gets to override the Fed on issues of border control, the law is real clear on both.
- worksonmine 3y ago
  Why does the border control want to cut the fences to begin with? What's wrong with the official paths for asylum seekers? The right to seek asylum doesn't have to mean the country has to help them cross by illegal means. I live in a country where we tried that, doesn't help anyone least of all the migrants forced to live in underground communities. Incentivising chaos only brings more chaos, which may even be the goal.