Panama appears to be solving the abysmal UX of JNI but puts the final performance nowhere near close .NET (without even measuring direct P/Invokes which are lit

Panama appears to be solving the abysmal UX of JNI but puts the final performance nowhere near close .NET (without even measuring direct P/Invokes which are literal direct C calls if you statically link AOT binary). Do you have references that say otherwise? (I know you don't, it has JNI level of performance) p.s.: you have to be insane to use Java today on those listed platforms, which are much better served by C and now Rust. RPi is as small as it gets and on that I'd rather never touch any Java tooling because liking it is literal Stockholm syndrome - it is as low bar as it gets and almost anything else is better. p.p.s: for anyone's interested, here's the JEP for Panama: https://openjdk.org/jeps/424 https://openjdk.org/jeps/424 do give it a read, then look at C# spans and interop API and ask yourself whether you want to look again at Panama without gouging your eyes out.