4 ms·
> That we see nothing implies intellgent life is rare, short lived, or we're early in the age of the universe. Or it implies that not everybody's first instinc
by Intralexical 3y ago
> That we see nothing implies intellgent life is rare, short lived, or we're early in the age of the universe.
Or it implies that not everybody's first instinct on seeing a vast galaxy is to try to take it over ASAP.
If you want resources for quality of life— Gas giants are a thing. If you're an explorer driven by curiosity, then take only samples, leave only memories, right.
If you want money— Century-long shipping times with civilization-scaled fuel costs tend to eat into profit margins.
If you're worried about survival— genuinely worried about survival, on a level personal enough to motivate action, not just academically or for fun— then the focus is on people you know and care about; all of those are here.
In fact, I suspect the ones that see other stars and immediately think "Mine mine all mine!" probably have a higher chance of nuking themselves before they even get out of their star system.
- perilunar 3y ago> That we see nothing implies intellgent life is rare, short lived, or we're early in the age of the universe. > > Or it implies that not everybody's first instinct on seeing a vast galaxy is to try to take it over ASAP. Or it may simply imply that intelligent life is good at hiding and does not want to be seen e.g. the dark forest hypothesis.
- kuchenbecker 3y agoDark forest hypothesis uses lack of evidence as evidence. There is little to back the claim the galaxy is full, BUT if it is full then the Dark Forest could be a reason we haven't detected.