4 ms·
True this, and a far lower ding, closer to say, $0.01 than $10, could still be quite effective. Keep in mind that egregious robocall providers have been making
by dredmorbius 3y ago
True this, and a far lower ding, closer to say, $0.01 than $10, could still be quite effective.
Keep in mind that egregious robocall providers have been making billions of calls annually (55 billion in 2023: <https://www.techdirt.com/2024/01/16/americans-received-55-million-robocalls-in-2023-a-9-jump-from-2022/ https://www.techdirt.com/2024/01/16/americans-received-55-mi...>), whilst a typical instance was unable to pay a $10 million fine (<https://therecord.media/ftc-settles-with-company-that-facilitated-billions-of-robocalls https://therecord.media/ftc-settles-with-company-that-facili...>). At that rate, a per-call ding of only $0.0002 (2 hundredths of a cent) might prove sufficient. A penny-per-call penalty should actually be relatively effective against the lowest of the bottom-feeders, though a higher rate would afford additional protections.