4 ms·
> If you can get the resources you need in a microcontroller you can afford, and you prefer programming in Python... why not? Particularly when you consider th
by bemusedthrow75 3y ago
> If you can get the resources you need in a microcontroller you can afford, and you prefer programming in Python... why not?
Particularly when you consider that the "bloat" here has no secondary side-effects: it doesn't waste resources that other software could be using, because no other software is running.
I am a long-time web developer who has always intellectually understood the interest in microcontrollers but never had much of the need. I do now.
I'm not even a fan of Python but MicroPython is a surprisingly productive development experience and I've learned a lot in a very short time with a Pico W.
I will probably use TinyGo at some point in the future, particularly as I try to use smaller devices, and I'm not averse to porting to C, but I really rate the MicroPython ecosystem highly in terms of actual coverage, though mainly just the intent of it, which is unimpeachable IMO.
- AzuraIsCool 3y agoNot sure why you got down voted. > it doesn't waste resources that other software could be using, because no other software is running. While this is interesting observation it is not always true. A lot of devices are low power, and depend on battery.
- bemusedthrow75 3y agoOh gosh. You are entirely right :-) If that is why I was downvoted then I'd go along with it for sure.