26 ms·
The mention of planet's "installation," in the abstract and repeatedly throughout the article, I have found very confusing. The reference to Kopparapu et al. (2
by blackhaz 3y ago
The mention of planet's "installation," in the abstract and repeatedly throughout the article, I have found very confusing. The reference to Kopparapu et al. (2013) has no mention of the term whatsoever. I have found a mention of "instellation" from one of the authors working with Kopparapu [1]. Instellation, indeed, is, according to Wiki, "a generalization of insolation to stars other than the sun," which makes sense in this context.
I wonder if I am missing anything - given it's in MNRAS already - or this is likely an artifact of auto-correction.
[1] https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AGUFM.P21C1675D/abstract https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AGUFM.P21C1675D/abstra...
- rdslw 3y agoI don't have necessary knowledge to explain this, yet while using gpt4 to help me parse the abstract, gpt4 without missing a heartbeat, changed it to "Insolation refers to the amount of stellar energy a planet receives on its surface. The value "0.67s" indicates that TOI-715 b receives 67% of the solar energy Earth receives from the Sun. " Wiki ref check: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_irradiance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_irradiance