2 ms·
This aligns with my experience as well. My hypothesis is slightly different. When people have a strong enough need, they’re willing to look past UX/UI issues b
by SkyPuncher 3y ago
This aligns with my experience as well.
My hypothesis is slightly different. When people have a strong enough need, they’re willing to look past UX/UI issues because they see the core value. They’re okay using a “crappy” product because it’s actually doing something really important for them. Later in a products life, it needs a better Ui to attract the remaining user and compete with the market.
The crappy UI serves as a bit of a filter, helping you learn quickly if something is valuable.
- eightysixfour 3y agoI agree and I think our hypotheses are two sides of the same coin - if the UX is great it gains users that aren’t good for business, if the UX is bad it filters for users that deeply need the product. I’d certainly rather be in a startup that is dealing with the latter than the former.