4 ms·
Yep. As a UI/UX specialist, it’s nothing short of a nightmare. I can’t decide if it’s purposeful (they’re trying to kill the site), negligent (they can’t hire o
by temporallobe 3y ago
Yep. As a UI/UX specialist, it’s nothing short of a nightmare. I can’t decide if it’s purposeful (they’re trying to kill the site), negligent (they can’t hire or retain talent, or who they have is making bad decisions), or just full of corporate/organizational bloat (basically all decisions made by non-engineers such as stakeholders or investors designed to maximize profit and ad space).I am leaning towards bloat.
- mattmaroon 3y agoI think it’s just a really logical way for them to monetize. If the UI was good you’d never click on (or likely even see) an ad. I’d bet they just tested it and found that’s how they make money.
- lupire 3y agoPeople complaining about the site wouldn't pay for the site they say they want.
- mattmaroon 3y agoThat’s probably true and for a long time Quora was of sufficient value that I would have said it was worth it. Anymore that’s not the case. Answer quality has gone down drastically and the percent of Google searches that end up there has gone up. Google really ought to de-index them. And don’t even get me started on Pinterest.