> Moreover, if it wasn't for people living in remote areas, people in the cities wouldn't have food. We need to be careful with the words here. Not much in th

> Moreover, if it wasn't for people living in remote areas, people in the cities wouldn't have food. We need to be careful with the words here. Not much in the way of food is produced by people who live in what I would term "remote" areas. Lots of food is produced by people who live in what I would term "rural" areas. We can and should and must provide improved communications services to rural areas - I think we have a moral imperative to do so. The remote areas, however, are a different story. If they happen to end up being serviced by e.g. Starlink then great, but I don't think we have the same moral imperative there.