23 ms·
Surely my absence played no pivotal role in their downfall. I didn't even know Quora had "died". How sad. RIP Quora. But a tjpnz said: "They're also driving aw
by nonrandomstring 3y ago
Surely my absence played no pivotal role in their downfall. I didn't
even know Quora had "died". How sad. RIP Quora. But a tjpnz said:
"They're also driving away contributors with more altruistic motivations"
Now, I can agree with that, because I see a very strong alignment
between the set of people who strongly uphold their own values and
have self-respect, and those who stand up for the rights of others and
have something to give.
The "walled garden" internet basically drives away people who give a
fuck.
- zht 3y agoOne other way of saying “drives away people who give a fuck” could be saying those people are self-aggrandizing, self important, always yelling at the top of their lungs about their zealotry telling everyone at first opportunity about how they turn off JavaScript and don’t contribute the much to the discussion I liken people like this to the Amish. They balk at modernity as being incompatible with their beliefs. So they withdraw from the world and live life as they see fit. What they don’t do is go around all the time yelling at people telling them how their lifestyle is wrong or constantly telling other people how they don’t use certain technologies.
- nonrandomstring 3y agoThat really flipped your wig didn't it? I'm intellectually curious, what you're so deeply invested in that was just threatened?
- scarface_74 3y agoHe’s right, people who always talk about they don’t use sites that require Javacript adds about as much to the conversation as people who show up in television conversations and say “I haven’t owned a television in 20 years, do people still watch TV?”
- nonrandomstring 3y agoForget about me for a moment. Does Javascript really mean something important to you?
- scarface_74 3y agoNot running JavaScript in 2024 is like putting a speed governor on your own car that limits you to going 35 miles an hour. It serves no useful purpose
- nonrandomstring 3y ago> It serves no useful purpose No useful purpose to who?
- scarface_74 3y agoWhat purpose do you have for removing functionality that has been part of the web since the 90s?
- nonrandomstring 3y agoOf course. What I do not want or need is code that's been part of the web since about 2016-2020, which is arbitrary code execution by complete strangers. Not even in a sandboxed disposable web browser. Now I suspect you'll want to tell me how actually Javascript is perfectly safe... and that's a conversation we can save for another day for the sake of both our dignity and friendship. I'm afraid it's my job to know otherwise.
- scarface_74 3y agoWell despite your appeal to authority… If you knew about that many exploits in the wild, surely you could (white hat) tell the company who created the browser or (black hat) make a lot of money by selling it to three letter agencies or private companies that sell it to three letter agencies. However, in the real world, a fully patched Android or iOS operating system - especially one that is in “lock down mode” is not any more susceptible to Zero day exploits than the number of other exploitable parts of the OS that you also don’t have any control over. And even if you only run open source software, how long was the OpenSSL bug in operating systems before it was discovered? Do you use your mobile’s messaging system? That’s been one of the primary targets of exploits that will target you directly.