So, the fourth paragraph of the article is supposed to demonstrate the decline of Quora. It has a number of links. One of those links shows a UI that's fairly

So, the fourth paragraph of the article is supposed to demonstrate the decline of Quora. It has a number of links. One of those links shows a UI that's fairly obviously Reddit! [1] Another is to genius.com's lyrics to some song[2] which don't seem to have anything to do with anything the author's complaining about. Of the links actually relevant to Quora, one is about an obvious joke[3], which the author either doesn't understand or pretends not to. What's left is a case of spam[4], that the article links twice. I'd suppose because it's the only evidence the author has of low quality questions on Quora. While Quora is a horrible website, I'd say the evidence shows Slate is worse. Their reporters can't even find genuine evidence of Quora's low quality. They show us Reddit instead. [1] https://twitter.com/3DrakaiNa/status/1743993622737863056 https://twitter.com/3DrakaiNa/status/1743993622737863056 [2] https://genius.com/23826656 https://genius.com/23826656 [3] https://twitter.com/Zeronelite/status/1743449094360596802 https://twitter.com/Zeronelite/status/1743449094360596802 [4] https://hollywoodactress02.quora.com/OMG-KING-CHARLES-SHOCK-the-WORLD-with-ROYAL-BAN-ON-PRINCE-HARRY-AND-MEGHAN-MARKLE-SAD https://hollywoodactress02.quora.com/OMG-KING-CHARLES-SHOCK-...