3 ms·
> I think soon people will be seeking out verified human-created, human-curated content. For this humans should be willing to pay another human for their effor
by achow 3y ago
> I think soon people will be seeking out verified human-created, human-curated content.
For this humans should be willing to pay another human for their efforts. Which history has shown would be tough.
- Workaccount2 3y agoWe could use things like banner ads and side column videos to fill the gap!
- theGnuMe 3y agoI pay for books and music so..?
- lazide 3y agoHow will you tell which ones are made by real humans, and which ones are AI generated? And regardless, which have real content when the reviews and ads are also generated?
- whynotmaybe 3y agoI think we should collectively lower our quality standards and accept grammatical errors in books. As human are fallible, a mistake in a book would show that it's "human made". Or start a "no ai used" certification process like for organic vegetables?
- lazide 3y agoChatGPT type AI will (and does) happily make spelling and grammar mistakes if it makes the output more believable. It’s a believable-it’s-human output generator, not an actually-true output generator. Historically, the two have been strongly correlated - but that connection has been weakening more and more over time, as the correlation is dependent on the actual knowledge level and ability to apply critical thinking to judge it. It’s going to be the world’s best liar if it can be. Even if that means mostly telling the truth most of the time. And considering ’organic’ certification allows a large whitelist of pesticides….