3 ms·
I don't know, but offstead things might contain "incidents" with child names and whatnot. Google Docs may not comply with the standards needed. I think the bigg
by 6c696e7578 3y ago
I don't know, but offstead things might contain "incidents" with child names and whatnot. Google Docs may not comply with the standards needed. I think the bigger clouds have the security levels, but there may be costs involved. Don't know basically but it might be a deal breaker.
- oxfordmale 3y agoYes, it is very likely Fooljitsu and Crapita consultants manage to convince them that existing systems do not comply with the relevant laws, and propose an in-house system. I have worked in software consultancy myself. The problem is that the project often starts with senior Engineers, who then gradually get moved to impress new clients, with the final product being delivered by overworked junior Engineers. Until the government gets better at overseeing such large projects, this will keep on happening. However, as governments not spending their own money, but tax payers money instead, there is little incentive.
- whimsicalism 3y agoThis is where the law needs to confront with actual reality. The reality is that data leakage, incorrect access, etc. are all much more likely with a bespoke in-house product than with google docs, even if they haven’t bothered getting the cert needed.
- 6c696e7578 3y agoYes, but I think ownership is easier to prove when the product is inhouse, regardless of what reality is, if you can point at the thing that has the data in the room next door, that is easier to show than somewhere in cyber space. For that reason I think these bespoke solutions are not going anywhere for the foreseeable. In regards to the Post Office scandal, that same ballsup could happen in any cloud.