4 ms·
I'm not sure a zero-shot foundational model for time series makes sense at all: if you only look at the numbers it's the "continue the sequence" game, nowhere t
by alexey-salmin 3y ago
I'm not sure a zero-shot foundational model for time series makes sense at all: if you only look at the numbers it's the "continue the sequence" game, nowhere to apply your "foundational knowledge" really.
A one-shot model that takes a prompt like "this sequence is a voltage of a PV-cell every hour" will have a chance though.
- hackerlight 3y ago> A one-shot model that takes a prompt like "this sequence is a voltage of a PV-cell every hour" will have a chance though. Such information will somewhat be embedded in the network (a new voltage graph will look similar to the voltage graphs it's seen before) but it should be better to make it explicit.
- mistrial9 3y agoyou are right, but being right is not enough! For a lot of real-world cases, the automation is worth it, despite information problems. to be clear, I share these concerns