Well given this is in response to the statement: > "It’s pretty simple, don’t dump chemicals in water or on land period." Then i still maintain anyone using t

Well given this is in response to the statement: > "It’s pretty simple, don’t dump chemicals in water or on land period." Then i still maintain anyone using that definition of chemical in the context of that statement is an utter idiot. > Now would you like to discuss which "substances produced by chemical processes" are likely to be the most impactful upon the environment Why? There is already a government department tasked with that, that can probably do a better job then you or i could. If you're trying to argue that the status quo is fine and we shouldn't change anything, then you have a weird way of doing so.