4 ms·
> run by a democratic system where the voters are shareholders The more shares you hold, the greater your voice, when it comes to corporate governance. It's no
by gottorf 3y ago
> run by a democratic system where the voters are shareholders
The more shares you hold, the greater your voice, when it comes to corporate governance. It's not at all the same as the typical idea of democracy as "one person, one vote".
Would you rather corporate governance be more like a political democracy, where no matter if someone has 30% of the shares or 0.0001%, they get the same vote? Or, perhaps the other way around, you'd like to change a political democracy to:
> limiting who allowed to own shares to people work are directly involved
where suffrage is limited to people who work and contribute to society?
- shkkmo 3y ago> The more shares you hold, the greater your voice, when it comes to corporate governance. It's not at all the same as the typical idea of democracy as "one person, one vote". "One person, one vote" is not how the presidency works in the USA. Beyond that, you seem to trying setup some strawman positions rather than engaging in a discussion about anything anyone actually said.