5 ms·
The ones that bother are me are things like the transparency on the window borders. It's transparent, but it blurs the background. It serves no purpose - if i
by jwilliams 18y ago
The ones that bother are me are things like the transparency on the window borders.
It's transparent, but it blurs the background.
It serves no purpose - if it was transparent and you could see though, I could guess there might be some practical application.
OS X has a lot of eyecandy, some of which is totally useless, but a lot of it does have practical value (e.g. expose looks good and I use it all the time).
- ivank 18y agoIf you don't like it, why haven't you turned Aero off, or replaced the theme? Windows doesn't force you to live with any defaults.
- niels_olson 18y agoplease provide examples of totally useless eye candy in OS X.
- neilc 18y agoThe animation that happens when Expose is activated, the "Genie Effect" for minimizing windows, and the reflections of dock icons that show up when the dock is at the bottom of the screen are examples that come immediately to mind. (Arstechnica enumerated some of the UI regressions in their Leopard review.)
- mamama 18y agoI feel Expose is quite counter-productive. The golden rule any developer must know: never use the mouse. Multiple desktops and Quicksilver (instead of the dock, which is quite distracting) are far more efficient.
- hbien 18y agoYou can use Expose with your arrow keys instead of the mouse.
- lallysingh 18y agoThe genie effect tells you where in the dock the window is, and the expose effect tells you which desktop you're currently on.
- jpd 18y agoYou'd think that there would be a standard place for minimized windows to go so that it isn't needed or something...
- jwilliams 18y agoIn Leopard they introduced reflections and the blue dots to the dock... Both eye candy over the old rev in my view...