3 ms·
I'm sorry, but this feels like a non sequitur. I completely agree with both of your statements. But I don't see it being related to what I said? Unless you're
by rockemsockem 3y ago
I'm sorry, but this feels like a non sequitur.
I completely agree with both of your statements. But I don't see it being related to what I said? Unless you're saying that having any rich people contaminates the system?
- DrNosferatu 3y agoThe point is that progressive very high taxes are indeed a good idea (or some form of “Limitarianism”). Alternatively, but in the same direction, the taxpayer should get a dividend on their investment. Is not by chance that big tech prospered in comfortable societies, and not in, say, some place full of roaming gangs flashing fixed big machine guns on the back of their pickup trucks.
- rockemsockem 3y agoYeah I agree with that. I don't agree with the notion that "there should be no individuals who are rich enough to fund great projects"