3 ms·

You're like a dog chasing your own tail, everything you ask has already been covered in previous comments (such as how vim listens for keys from external bindin

You're like a dog chasing your own tail, everything you ask has already been covered in previous comments (such as how vim listens for keys from external bindings or how those bindings can know the mode from vim). I don't enjoy repeating myself and it's obvious you're not looking for solutions only drama. I don't know what modtap program you should use, I don't use them you're the one demanding it. Do you have mech keyboard, use that? Fuck do I know, DYOR. Nothing I would suggest would satisfy you anyway and my patience ran out several comments ago. What programs do you use and what _exactly_ are you missing in vim. Is it modtap? A GUI? I don't even know what you're so pissed about and you refuse to mention it. Be constructive or find something else to waste your time on, this will most likely be my last response as I don't expect anything different in your next one.

eviks 3y ago
> everything you ask has already been covered in previous comments No, you've covered nothing, I've pointed to flaws in your supposed solutions, but your imagination covered them. Not a single solution > I don't enjoy repeating myself You don't need to, you can address specific issues you keep repeatedly ignoring Instead of retreating back to your: > I don't know what modtap program you should use I know, and that's the biggest problem in this conversation - you don't know a lot, yet keep imagining you do and arguing that the solution "oh must exist, just use your imagination, here is some naive kludge about window titles and mech keyboards" > Do you have mech keyboard, use that? So how would the mech keyboard firmware know what command and mode vim is in the middle of? Oh, wait, you have no clue, you don't use anything, so why do you keep offering all these non-solutions? > it's obvious you're not looking for solutions I am, that's why I asked the question, you're just not competent enough to offer any > Nothing I would suggest would satisfy you anyway Yes, that would require more knowledge and less arrogance on your part > you're the one demanding it. Quote where I demand it. That's just another one of your rhetorical fissy twists > what _exactly_ are you missing in vim The original comment was just one sentence, and it lists exactly what I'm missing, including exact examples. The fact that you're still clueless after so many comments is on you > I don't even know what you're so pissed about and you refuse to mention it. I'm pissed about aggressive ignoramuses dismissing problems and wasting time policing words and offering empty solutions because vim pinkies are fine and convenient for them. Just to clarify to make it a bit harder for you to twist it again - I'm not pissed about the fact that there is no great keybinding support in vim GUI, great things are rare
- worksonmine 3y ago
  Yes, you're right. I'm sorry vim doesn't raise your chickens and cook your tendies. What a terrible software. Your mom will have to do until someone creates something better. See, I can also completely miss the point and act all high and mighty. It's not my problem my suggestions aren't good enough, however you've not mentioned a single solution you are happy with. How come?
  - eviks 3y ago
    > I can also completely miss the point and act all high and mighty You've misspelled "All I can do is". It is your problem since you're the one sticking like a flea trying to prove your suggestions are good with a sprinkle of imagination, and getting all pissy when you run out of arguments. Be constructive or find something else to waste your time on
    - worksonmine 3y ago
      Can you show me on the picture where vim touched you? The saying "never argue with idiots, they will only bring you down to their level and win by experience" has never been more relevant. But now I'm kind of curious where this is heading, how long are you willing to keep this up? In how many ways can you say "but what about you" or repeat what I've already said? Do you feel clever doing this? Since the beginning you've been antagonistic about the most simple things. I'll give you an example: >>>> but I swap esc and caps since esc is my most used key >>> So you use your most used key with a sidewise motion of your weakest finger of your weakest hand? That's just bad ergonomics, and that's what's wrong with the native keybindings >> I'll clarify that for you, my most used individual key. Most of my typing is on the home row. > I'll clarify that for you: this is still a big ergonomic issue typing notwithstanding And this goes on, and on, and on. All of a sudden 2 comments in my "stupid choice of keybindings" is the topic. You break up every sentence into 15 quotes finding anything and everything you can to get back at, why? I'm not trying to win anything here, there are no prizes or awards. Only wasted time. What is so difficult about staying on topic? Why are you going out of your way to derail the discussion and making this about me to avoid answering a single relevant question I ask?

eviks 3y ago

> everything you ask has already been covered in previous comments No, you've covered nothing, I've pointed to flaws in your supposed solutions, but your imagination covered them. Not a single solution > I don't enjoy repeating myself You don't need to, you can address specific issues you keep repeatedly ignoring Instead of retreating back to your: > I don't know what modtap program you should use I know, and that's the biggest problem in this conversation - you don't know a lot, yet keep imagining you do and arguing that the solution "oh must exist, just use your imagination, here is some naive kludge about window titles and mech keyboards" > Do you have mech keyboard, use that? So how would the mech keyboard firmware know what command and mode vim is in the middle of? Oh, wait, you have no clue, you don't use anything, so why do you keep offering all these non-solutions? > it's obvious you're not looking for solutions I am, that's why I asked the question, you're just not competent enough to offer any > Nothing I would suggest would satisfy you anyway Yes, that would require more knowledge and less arrogance on your part > you're the one demanding it. Quote where I demand it. That's just another one of your rhetorical fissy twists > what _exactly_ are you missing in vim The original comment was just one sentence, and it lists exactly what I'm missing, including exact examples. The fact that you're still clueless after so many comments is on you > I don't even know what you're so pissed about and you refuse to mention it. I'm pissed about aggressive ignoramuses dismissing problems and wasting time policing words and offering empty solutions because vim pinkies are fine and convenient for them. Just to clarify to make it a bit harder for you to twist it again - I'm not pissed about the fact that there is no great keybinding support in vim GUI, great things are rare

worksonmine 3y ago
Yes, you're right. I'm sorry vim doesn't raise your chickens and cook your tendies. What a terrible software. Your mom will have to do until someone creates something better. See, I can also completely miss the point and act all high and mighty. It's not my problem my suggestions aren't good enough, however you've not mentioned a single solution you are happy with. How come?
- eviks 3y ago
  > I can also completely miss the point and act all high and mighty You've misspelled "All I can do is". It is your problem since you're the one sticking like a flea trying to prove your suggestions are good with a sprinkle of imagination, and getting all pissy when you run out of arguments. Be constructive or find something else to waste your time on
  - worksonmine 3y ago
    Can you show me on the picture where vim touched you? The saying "never argue with idiots, they will only bring you down to their level and win by experience" has never been more relevant. But now I'm kind of curious where this is heading, how long are you willing to keep this up? In how many ways can you say "but what about you" or repeat what I've already said? Do you feel clever doing this? Since the beginning you've been antagonistic about the most simple things. I'll give you an example: >>>> but I swap esc and caps since esc is my most used key >>> So you use your most used key with a sidewise motion of your weakest finger of your weakest hand? That's just bad ergonomics, and that's what's wrong with the native keybindings >> I'll clarify that for you, my most used individual key. Most of my typing is on the home row. > I'll clarify that for you: this is still a big ergonomic issue typing notwithstanding And this goes on, and on, and on. All of a sudden 2 comments in my "stupid choice of keybindings" is the topic. You break up every sentence into 15 quotes finding anything and everything you can to get back at, why? I'm not trying to win anything here, there are no prizes or awards. Only wasted time. What is so difficult about staying on topic? Why are you going out of your way to derail the discussion and making this about me to avoid answering a single relevant question I ask?