They are using the very factual and context appropriate term that the agency responsible for issuing these orders is using. The reason for this is that the OTA

They are using the very factual and context appropriate term that the agency responsible for issuing these orders is using. The reason for this is that the OTA update is a _convenience_. If the OTA update fails or causes other issues Tesla is still required to bring the cars in and fix them as required and cannot attempt to treat related, associated, or casual errors and issues differently. You're confusing agencies allowing this to happen as a luxury instead of understanding the teeth behind the policy.