3 ms·
I agree and would first urge people to test IPv6 client access using some lazy-loaded image that is IPv6 only on their website. It should look like a normal re
by LinuxBender 3y ago
I agree and would first urge people to test IPv6 client access using some lazy-loaded image that is IPv6 only on their website. It should look like a normal resource so that false-negatives are not introduced by NoScript or uBlock.
People can of course manually test here [1] from their homes, schools, work place. I would wager most cellular data networks would be fine. The impact would probably depend on how a website is utilized. Stats on mobile vs. non-mobile would probably be telling. The people on their cell should test LTE vs Wifi and clear cache between tests.
[1] - https://test-ipv6.com/ https://test-ipv6.com/
- move-on-by 3y agoYou would lose that wager. I’m in the southeast United States. My ISP, Spectrum, works fine with IPv6. My cellular provider, Total by Verizon, is IPv4 only.
- Dagger2 3y agoOne provider without v6 doesn't mean that most providers don't have v6.
- LinuxBender 3y agoFor what it's worth I did qualify my statement using most. A few of the older cellular networks are slower to adopt and sadly I can understand why having worked for one of them. If you find it interesting here [1] are some rudimentary stats from the US. It's not an all inclusive picture of things. [1] - https://ipv6-test.com/stats/country/US https://ipv6-test.com/stats/country/US
- unquietwiki 3y agoAnd now you reminded me of the "Dancing Turtle" from KAME. https://www.kame.net/ https://www.kame.net/