4 ms·

What I meant is "being kept alive by artificial means". You can live without having a functioning hand - you can't without a functioning heart. But, to some ext

What I meant is "being kept alive by artificial means". You can live without having a functioning hand - you can't without a functioning heart. But, to some extent yes, if it's something your body cannot recover (well enough) from, and you have to resort to external interventions by planting some kind of artificial material into you body, it's faking your body's capabilities. May be life saving or improve quality of live significantly for sure, but it's an illusion, it's not you in your biological entirety. I am not smart or eloquent enough to describe it in detail, but that's the gist of it.

deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
QuercusMax 3y ago
Is the use of eyeglasses or hearing aids "fake" too? Or do you have some kind of fear of contamination, being "less-than-human"? Your views seem quite abnormal.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- sBqQu3U0wH 3y ago
  >Is the use of eyeglasses or hearing aids "fake" too? Yes. >Or do you have some kind of fear of contamination, being "less-than-human"? No. In fact, I have nothing against external life enhancing tools of any kind, be it glasses, hearing aids or anything else. I do not look down on anyone for having any kind of artificial devices, either invasive or non invasive. Just for me personally, the idea of having artificial devices as a permanent part of biological flesh feels awful. I like technology, but at hand's reach. >Your views seem quite abnormal. Good.