5 ms·
I hope these numbers aren't correct. Only 3% for being bombed by ads? (And bombing the whole city with ads on buses as well?) I would gladly pay 20% and maybe
by 317070 3y ago
I hope these numbers aren't correct. Only 3% for being bombed by ads? (And bombing the whole city with ads on buses as well?)
I would gladly pay 20% and maybe even 50% more if they could stop with the ads.
- Symbiote 3y agoI am conscious of those with more limited budgets. Rises of just 1-2% above inflation are already avoided if possible. I'd be fine with increasing the subsidy part of TfL's income to get rid of the adverts — then the cost falls mostly on those who can afford it.
- midasuni 3y agoFrom memory the entire ad income for sky was about 1/10th of their income as a whole. That includes all that damaging gambling adverts in football matches. People are far too accepting of adverts imo, it’s a horrendous industry