4 ms·
No, the fact that by the time they're eligible for the draft, and of the 10-15 taken every year, there's usually little to differentiate the top picks from the
by robg 18y ago
No, the fact that by the time they're eligible for the draft, and of the 10-15 taken every year, there's usually little to differentiate the top picks from the worst. What separates them is anyone's guess. That's Gladwell's point.
- mattmaroon 18y agoBut if you look at the top picks and the bottom picks, you find almost none of the bottom picks starting in the nfl (you named a few who did it in the last decade) and a ton of the top picks who are, or are at least second strings to superstars. I would say that means that what separates them is far from anyone's guess. There's certainly some variance there (see Tim Couch) but it's not unpredictable.
- robg 18y agoThe complicating factor, of course, is all those former first rounders but second stringers, have had significant money invested in them. It's a lot easier to cut the lower picked players but not necessarily because of their "talent". Matt Cassell = perfect example. Does he even get a chance on any other team? Ever?
- mattmaroon 18y agoA lot of great QBs got their starts when the superstar they were behind got injured. Steve Young for instance.