>Is he not the face of the “bio hacking”? You're overgeneralizing, it's fallacious to suggest we should judge the state biohacking by someone you determined (a

>Is he not the face of the “bio hacking”? You're overgeneralizing, it's fallacious to suggest we should judge the state biohacking by someone you determined (and brought up) to be the face of it. Defending "serious biohacking attempts" after saying "and these so-called "biohackers" have become an elaborate joke" makes you appear confused about your stance.