His credentials indicate that it may be possible that his arguments are based on data while your credentials and evidence indicate personal, anecdotal experienc

His credentials indicate that it may be possible that his arguments are based on data while your credentials and evidence indicate personal, anecdotal experience. Therefore I would trust his reasoning more. Additionally, I personally identify with it. I mean a git developer finds git easy to use? That's biased data. I love how both of you dropped your street cred before launching into your reasoning. It just shows how much more credentials convinces people rather then the argument itself. Normally that stuff logically doesn't matter and people are just doing it to grab some "authoritah" but in this case your backgrounds actually contributed to the arguments.