3 ms·
Harvard also has owned 1/6 of Allston since the 1920’s. People act like additional 1/6 they bought 1990-2016 made huge changes to neighborhood housing prices, b
by cowsandmilk 3y ago
Harvard also has owned 1/6 of Allston since the 1920’s. People act like additional 1/6 they bought 1990-2016 made huge changes to neighborhood housing prices, but Allston was gentrifying regardless. CSX was moving out, which inevitably was going to lead to Houghton shutting down their rail yard. New Balance was growing right on Allston’s doorstep. That’s what brought Boston Landing and 10-15 minute rides downtown, not Harvard.
But overall, the biggest driver of gentrification was the campaign by Eva Webster to treat half of Brighton like it is the Back Bay. You can’t replace your windows, much less build new housing, due to https://www.boston.gov/historic-district/aberdeen-architectural-conservation-district https://www.boston.gov/historic-district/aberdeen-architectu... . That’s what caps the growth of housing and drives prices up.
- prepend 3y agoI think the issue is that they are removing tax revenue from the city, not that they cause the gentrification.
- BenFranklin100 3y agoBuild higher. Have you been to Allston and Brighton? It’s filled with crappy one to three story buildings that are 100 years old.
- jurynulifcation 3y agoOr let people retain the housing they want and tax the encroaching multibillion dollar institutions lmao
- BenFranklin100 3y agoThe housing people want is more housing but the city won’t let them build it because of its exclusionary zoning practices. Go lmao about that. There’s plenty of space to go vertical.
- jurynulifcation 3y agoThere's also probably plenty of space if we force these institutions to pay taxes on their land usage ;p