4 ms·
I’ve never heard of this movement before but it makes a lot of sense in the context of the time. This is about the time that David Hilbert would push the world
by timeagain 3y ago
I’ve never heard of this movement before but it makes a lot of sense in the context of the time. This is about the time that David Hilbert would push the world of mathematics to tie up its last loose ends. Physics was seeming “almost done” as well, since we hadn’t foreseen quantum mechanics. Modern architecture was well underway, creating perfectly reproducible, characterless buildings that would perfectly fit anywhere.
I can only imagine how self-important and insufferable academics must have been at the time, with the feeling in the air that all problems were just about to be solved and modernity had officially arrived.
The next generation would produce figures like Wittgenstein, Gödel, Turing, Einstein—all of whom in their own way contributed to “officially” putting academia in its place. Pataphysics seems to me like an informal attack to the same effect, an artistic intuition that there must be things uncomputable, undecidable, uncertain, and otherwise ineffable.
- timeagain 3y agoI also love the fact that Baudrillard was a “patapysician.” It fits nicely with his philosophical works, where he focuses on how the metaphors we create become our reality, and then we dump more metaphors on top of these in an endless cycle of “hyper realization” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperreality
- truculent 3y agoThat’s a really interesting perspective, I think it makes a lot of sense. I was thinking about this alongside the emergence of magical realism in literature, but it looks like that took off a touch late (1920s per Wikipedia). It’s possible that earlier influences (e.g. Gogol) might have had a hand in both, but I find the reaction to scientific essentialism more compelling with respect to Pataphysics.