2 ms·
> In democracies, there is substantial or complete independence between the branches of govt — legislative, judicial, and executive I don't think that's true a
by tivert 3y ago
> In democracies, there is substantial or complete independence between the branches of govt — legislative, judicial, and executive
I don't think that's true at all, and I believe separation of powers is (to large degree) and Americanism.
I think most democracies lack or have very weak separation of powers, and are ruled under a principle of legislative supremacy.
That's pretty clear in the UK (where parliamentary supremacy is a bedrock principle of their unwritten constitution), and I believe in Napoleonic law countries there's no sense where a court can strike down a law as "unconstitutional," because I understand courts there aren't bound by precedent in the same way common law courts are.
- toss1 3y agoYes, and those are considered weaker democracies than where the separations of power are wider and stronger. It can also be observed over time, and the UK is definitely on a slide in the authoritarian direction, not necessarily unstoppable, but definite. Again, also notice this includes not only branches of govt, but how the societal institutions maintain separation, industry, press, academy, religion, social orgs, nonprofits, sports, etc.