> In the US, at least, he'd have to provide some evidence that the article isn't true, which he probably can't. Realistically, he just has to be able to throw

> In the US, at least, he'd have to provide some evidence that the article isn't true, which he probably can't. Realistically, he just has to be able to throw more money and lawyers at the situation than his opponents could. Maybe a bigger journalistic outfit could/would fight it, but the small blogs would probably be easy pickin'.