This worked for the 15th when they had racist voting (took until year 2000 to fix). Ginsberg, showing her true pro racism colors, dissented in Rice v cayetano.

This worked for the 15th when they had racist voting (took until year 2000 to fix). Ginsberg, showing her true pro racism colors, dissented in Rice v cayetano. The 14th for HHA would be a worthy case no doubt. That aside, previous CRA under 14/15 were struck, it didn't stick until expansion of commerce under wickard.